flyingskull: (Default)
[personal profile] flyingskull
It's quite easy to 'cheat' on these quizzes. This one was easier than the Draco one, though. In the Draco one I had to be subtle and understand the key questions to get my lil dragonet. In this it was simply spelled out for me to get Gambit. And I did. *G*

You scored as Gambit. Gambit is another loner character. He loves Rogue. He has a very cool deboner personality. He's done things in his past that he's not proud of but he atones for his actions by fighting for peace with the X-Men. His weapon of choice is the playing card. Powers: Charges objects with kinetic energy by touching them, then they explode like grenades.

</td>

Gambit

100%

Wolverine

70%

Emma Frost

65%

Iceman

65%

Jean Grey

60%

Colossus

55%

Rogue

50%

Storm

45%

Beast

40%

Cyclops

30%

Nightcrawler

25%

Most Comprehensive X-Men Personality Quiz 2.0
created with QuizFarm.com


Oh, and that's NOT how one should spell 'debonair'. Really, people, learn words!

Date: 2006-07-09 12:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] candrawest.livejournal.com
Yeah, yeah, it can be rigged, never denied that. But I got Jeannie with an 80% ranking by answering as honestly as possible given the options available. I'm well aware that the answers are reasonably obvious about who you will get. Though I've never achieved 100% on the desired character, apparently there are a some subtleties. Well, that or I define the characters radically different from other people on a few key points.

Date: 2006-07-09 04:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyingskull.livejournal.com
You're absolutely right, of course, I cheated blatantly to try and get what I wanted. I don't think your view of the characters is off at all or even radically different. Of course each of us has her/his own view of what I make bold to call the 'secondary' aspects of a character, and that's where I was clearly lucky.

I think the degree of yes or no was where I got more percentage of exactness. I used a lot the 'almost yes' and 'almost no' buttons and a few of the 'neutral' central button when I wasn't sure of the kind of answer I needed to give to get Gambit.

That said, y'know, I was honest in my own despicable way: I was honestly doing my best to read the quiz compiler's mind. *G*

Date: 2006-07-09 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baeraad.livejournal.com
According to the test, I'm Cyclops.

...

Clearly, online tests are not my friends. >_< ^_^;;

Date: 2006-07-09 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyingskull.livejournal.com
Depends, luv. Who were you trying to be? :P

Also, what's wrong with Cyke? I always liked him a lot!

Date: 2006-07-09 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baeraad.livejournal.com
Well, I wasn't trying to be anyone, but I was hoping for Beast. :) Or Nightcrawler. Heck, I'd have settled for Emma Frost. ^_^;;

I'm glad you like Cyclops, since apparently that's who I am (stupid test ^_^;), but most people seem not to, and I personally don't. He's so boring. So stick-in-the-mud. So law-abiding, humourless, rational, respecting-the-chain-of-command, whitebread, buzzkill...

...

... yeah, okay, I admit it, the test is annoyingly right, because I'm exactly like that. But, but, but... I'm trying not to be! I don't want to be a good boy, I want to be a dashing anti-hero, darn it! =]

Date: 2006-07-12 10:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyingskull.livejournal.com
Beast? BEAST?!! Good Heavens, luv, are you sure you're not a masochist as well? BEAST???? (Oooops, way too many ?, got panicked)

No, alright, poor Hank. He was a truly marvbellous idea for a character, but Marvel squashed him into an imporbable language and utterly inane reactions. At the beginning - do you hate me yet for harping on things that ahppened before I was born out of a somawhat Dracoish immense respect for my father? - he was saddled with the same improbable language, but at least he had a 'thing' going on with Iceman. But after that? UGGHY, Cyke is SO much more interesting!

And as for Kurt, why oh why did they have to saddle him with the whole catholic shebang? Can't we have a happy teleport for once?

Cyke ain't such a pole-up-his-ass-stick-in-the mud person! c'mon! There's absolutely nothing wrong with having a sense of justic and a sense that power should be regulated somehow. And Jean, being the spiffy first-woman-leader-of-a-superhero-group and goddess is proof enough that he's got wrth, sexiness and virtues: non-flamboyant ones, true, but SEX IN UNDERPANTS OVER SPANDEX all the same. Not to mention the real brain and th real sense that a society needs justice.

Luv you to pieces.

Date: 2006-07-13 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baeraad.livejournal.com
> Good Heavens, luv, are you sure you're not a masochist as well?

It's true, sometimes I wonder that myself. =]

I can't help it. I like Beast. He's so funny. Not the most realistic of characters, I concede, but superheroes are supposed to be larger than life. Therein lies the attraction. =]

Okay, confession - I don't read X-Men comics (I'm a DC person. =]). All I know about any of these guys I get from a) the movies or b) fanfiction. My info may be a little out of date - I wasn't aware that "the Iceman thing" wasn't still going on, for example. ^_^;

> do you hate me yet for harping on things that ahppened before I was
> born out of a somawhat Dracoish immense respect for my father?

Never. :) I'm probably better informed about the childhood of the Marvelverse than I am about its present state, anyway.

I've read every The Amazing Spiderman issue between 1 and 125, for instance, but I'm very vague on what the venerable webcrawler is doing these days. I hear he's got a clone now. Oh, and just about every one of his old friends and enemies have been cloned, too. It all sounds very... strange. ^_^;

> And as for Kurt, why oh why did they have to saddle him with the
> whole catholic shebang?

For the irony of having a character that looks like a devil and is a devout Christian? =] I don't know, really. He wasn't like that at the beginning?

You make a compelling argument for Cyclops. It can't be easy, being the token sane person. =] And true, he has managed to get himself a very formidable wife. Must be there's something to be said for him. =]

> SEX IN UNDERPANTS OVER SPANDEX

(*almost chokes from laughing so hard*) Aaahhhh... you may have a point, I suppose. I mean, if he has the same absolute devotion to doing things properly in all areas of his life... ;)

> Luv you to pieces.

The sentiment is mutual. :)

Oh, and I'm having opinions on Oscar Wilde and Crawford Kilian over at my lj. Wanna swing by and tell me what I've overlooked? =]

Date: 2006-07-13 09:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyingskull.livejournal.com
gld to make you laugh.

Swinging by this instant! Oscar and Killian? YUMMY!

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
202122 23242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 1st, 2025 01:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios