flyingskull: (Default)
flyingskull ([personal profile] flyingskull) wrote2006-07-09 01:35 am

Just as I thought!

It's quite easy to 'cheat' on these quizzes. This one was easier than the Draco one, though. In the Draco one I had to be subtle and understand the key questions to get my lil dragonet. In this it was simply spelled out for me to get Gambit. And I did. *G*

You scored as Gambit. Gambit is another loner character. He loves Rogue. He has a very cool deboner personality. He's done things in his past that he's not proud of but he atones for his actions by fighting for peace with the X-Men. His weapon of choice is the playing card. Powers: Charges objects with kinetic energy by touching them, then they explode like grenades.

</td>

Gambit

100%

Wolverine

70%

Emma Frost

65%

Iceman

65%

Jean Grey

60%

Colossus

55%

Rogue

50%

Storm

45%

Beast

40%

Cyclops

30%

Nightcrawler

25%

Most Comprehensive X-Men Personality Quiz 2.0
created with QuizFarm.com


Oh, and that's NOT how one should spell 'debonair'. Really, people, learn words!

[identity profile] flyingskull.livejournal.com 2006-07-12 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Beast? BEAST?!! Good Heavens, luv, are you sure you're not a masochist as well? BEAST???? (Oooops, way too many ?, got panicked)

No, alright, poor Hank. He was a truly marvbellous idea for a character, but Marvel squashed him into an imporbable language and utterly inane reactions. At the beginning - do you hate me yet for harping on things that ahppened before I was born out of a somawhat Dracoish immense respect for my father? - he was saddled with the same improbable language, but at least he had a 'thing' going on with Iceman. But after that? UGGHY, Cyke is SO much more interesting!

And as for Kurt, why oh why did they have to saddle him with the whole catholic shebang? Can't we have a happy teleport for once?

Cyke ain't such a pole-up-his-ass-stick-in-the mud person! c'mon! There's absolutely nothing wrong with having a sense of justic and a sense that power should be regulated somehow. And Jean, being the spiffy first-woman-leader-of-a-superhero-group and goddess is proof enough that he's got wrth, sexiness and virtues: non-flamboyant ones, true, but SEX IN UNDERPANTS OVER SPANDEX all the same. Not to mention the real brain and th real sense that a society needs justice.

Luv you to pieces.

[identity profile] baeraad.livejournal.com 2006-07-13 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
> Good Heavens, luv, are you sure you're not a masochist as well?

It's true, sometimes I wonder that myself. =]

I can't help it. I like Beast. He's so funny. Not the most realistic of characters, I concede, but superheroes are supposed to be larger than life. Therein lies the attraction. =]

Okay, confession - I don't read X-Men comics (I'm a DC person. =]). All I know about any of these guys I get from a) the movies or b) fanfiction. My info may be a little out of date - I wasn't aware that "the Iceman thing" wasn't still going on, for example. ^_^;

> do you hate me yet for harping on things that ahppened before I was
> born out of a somawhat Dracoish immense respect for my father?

Never. :) I'm probably better informed about the childhood of the Marvelverse than I am about its present state, anyway.

I've read every The Amazing Spiderman issue between 1 and 125, for instance, but I'm very vague on what the venerable webcrawler is doing these days. I hear he's got a clone now. Oh, and just about every one of his old friends and enemies have been cloned, too. It all sounds very... strange. ^_^;

> And as for Kurt, why oh why did they have to saddle him with the
> whole catholic shebang?

For the irony of having a character that looks like a devil and is a devout Christian? =] I don't know, really. He wasn't like that at the beginning?

You make a compelling argument for Cyclops. It can't be easy, being the token sane person. =] And true, he has managed to get himself a very formidable wife. Must be there's something to be said for him. =]

> SEX IN UNDERPANTS OVER SPANDEX

(*almost chokes from laughing so hard*) Aaahhhh... you may have a point, I suppose. I mean, if he has the same absolute devotion to doing things properly in all areas of his life... ;)

> Luv you to pieces.

The sentiment is mutual. :)

Oh, and I'm having opinions on Oscar Wilde and Crawford Kilian over at my lj. Wanna swing by and tell me what I've overlooked? =]

[identity profile] flyingskull.livejournal.com 2006-07-13 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
gld to make you laugh.

Swinging by this instant! Oscar and Killian? YUMMY!